Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 59-61 (January 2009)


View previous. 14 of 21 View next.

Photophobia, visual hallucinations, and REM sleep behavior disorder in progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal degeneration: A prospective study

Alex D. Cooper, Keith A. JosephsCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 1 October 2007; received in revised form 3 January 2008; accepted 7 January 2008.

Abstract 

Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal degeneration (CBD) have overlapping clinical features that can make clinical distinction between these two entities difficult. The present study compared the frequency of photophobia, visual hallucinations, and REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) in patients clinically diagnosed with PSP to those clinically suspected to have CBD. Photophobia occurred in all 10 (100%) PSP patients vs 2 (18%) patients with clinically suspected CBD (p=0.0002). Visual hallucinations and RBD occurred in patients with PSP and CBD but were rare occurrences (5% for each symptom). The presence of photophobia is significantly more frequent in clinically diagnosed PSP than CBD and can be used as a feature in differentiating between the two diseases in clinical practice. Visual hallucinations and RBD occur infrequently in PSP and CBD and are not useful symptoms in clinical differentiation.

Article Outline

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Methods

3. Results

4. Discussion

Conflict of interest

References

Copyright

1. Introduction 

return to Article Outline

Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal degeneration (CBD) are neurodegenerative disorders that display some overlapping clinical features. The core clinical features of PSP include vertical gaze palsy, axial more than appendicular rigidity, and early postural instability [1]. The core clinical features of CBD include asymmetric appendicular rigidity and cortical dysfunction including apraxia of limb [2]. The term corticobasal syndrome (CBS) has been applied to the clinical entity [2], while CBD refers to the pathologic entity.

When the cardinal features of these two diseases are present at disease onset, diagnosis may be relatively straightforward. However, clinical features of these two diseases often overlap and some of the cardinal features may not occur until later in the disease course. These atypical disease presentations can present a diagnostic dilemma, which may make it difficult for clinicians to predict disease progression. Therefore, additional clinical features that could distinguish PSP from CBD would be helpful in clinical practice. Photophobia has been described in PSP but not CBD to our knowledge [3]. Visual hallucinations and REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) have not been emphasized in either PSP or CBD. We conducted a study to determine the frequency of photophobia, visual hallucinations, and RBD in these two disease populations.

2. Methods 

return to Article Outline

One movement disorders specialist (KAJ) evaluated all patients with features suggestive of PSP and CBD from 2003 to 2006 at a single medical institution. The diagnosis of PSP or CBS was based on consensus criteria or pathologic confirmation. A clinical diagnosis of PSP was based on the report of the NINDS–SPSP International Workshop and a clinical diagnosis of CBS was based on criteria proposed by Boeve et al. [1], [2]. We questioned patients and their significant others regarding the presence of photophobia, visual hallucinations, and RBD. The question regarding photophobia emphasized discomfort as a result of light exposure as opposed to frequent eye closing or lack of eye opening. This distinction is important since both blepharospasm and apraxia of eye opening can be present in these disorders. Only well-formed visual hallucinations that were spontaneous and not associated with medication use were considered. REM sleep behavior disorder was considered present if the patient's bed partner reported abnormal limb movements during sleep that were disruptive or injurious to either the bed partner or the patient. We contacted the patient or spouse for missing data. Age of disease onset and sex were also documented. The frequency of each symptom within the PSP and CBS populations was calculated and compared to one another. We used the Mann–Whitney U, Chi-square, and Fisher's exact test for statistical analysis. The study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board.

3. Results 

return to Article Outline

Ten patients had PSP (Table 1), two with pathologic confirmation, and 11 patients had CBS (Table 2), one with pathologic confirmation. The median ages at disease onset in PSP and CBS were 66 (range 59–77) and 65 (range 49–91), respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.4). No significant gender differences occurred between both groups. Based on clinical criteria for PSP [1], four patients were classified as possible, four as probable, and two were definite (i.e. pathologically confirmed). Photophobia occurred in all 10 (100%) PSP patients vs 2 (18%) CBS patients (p=0.0002). The mean time between when the patient first reported photophobia and disease onset was 3.1 years. Blepharospasm was noted in only one patient in this series. He was one of the two CBS patients with photophobia and was pathologically confirmed to have CBD. Visual hallucinations occurred in 1 (5%) PSP patient and RBD occurred in 1 (5%) CBS patient. The visual hallucinations occurred in a PSP patient taking Levodopa/Carbidopa. The patient reported seeing people mostly at night time. The hallucinations continued despite reduction of the Levodopa/Carbidoba and, unfortunately, the patient died before further dose reductions could be made. The CBS patient with RBD had symptoms consisting of talking and performing exercising movements usually during the first 1–2h of sleep.

Table 1.

Characteristics of subjects diagnosed with progressive supranuclear palsy

Sex (F/M)
Age of disease onset
Presence of photophobia
Presence of visual hallucinations
Presence of REM behavior sleep disorder
Main presenting features
Comments
1F70YesNoNoVertical supranuclear gaze palsy, parkinsonism
2M62YesNoNoVertical supranuclear gaze palsy, parkinsonism
3F59YesNoNoReduced vertical gaze velocity, parkinsonism, incontinence
4M76YesYesN/AUpgaze paresis, parkinsonismPathology confirmed
5M69YesNoNoVertical supranuclear gaze palsy, parkinsonism
6F74YesNoNoVertical supranuclear gaze palsy, parkinsonism, apraxia of speech
7F62YesNoNoVertical supranuclear gaze palsy, parkinsonismPathology confirmed
8F77YesNoNoVertical supranuclear gaze palsy, parkinsonism
9M61YesNoNoVertical saccadic slowing, parkinsonism
10F59YesNoNoVertical supranuclear gaze palsy, parkinsonism
Table 2.

Characteristics of subjects diagnosed with corticobasal syndrome

Sex
Age of disease onset
Presence of photophobia
Presence of visual hallucinations
Presence of REM behavior sleep disorder
Main presenting features
Comments
1F65NoNoNoAsymmetric apraxia, aphasia
2M52YesNoYesParkinsonism, dysexecutive syndrome, personality change, vertical supranuclear gaze palsyPathology confirmed
3F72YesNoNoAsymmetric apraxia, parkinsonism, vertical supranuclear gaze palsy
4F55NoNoNoAsymmetric parkinsonism, alien arm phenomenon
5M65NoNoNoAsymmetric apraxia, agraphesthesia, parkinsonism, vertical supranuclear gaze palsy
6F53NoNoNoAsymmetric parkinsonism, alien arm phenomenon
7M69NoNoNoAsymmetric apraxia, parkinsonism,
8F65NoNoNoAsymmetric apraxia, agraphesthesia
9F68NoNoNoAsymmetric apraxia, parkinsonism, agraphesthesia
10F81NoNoNoAsymmetric parkinsonism, aphasia, alien leg phenomenon
11M49NoNoNoAsymmetric parkinsonism

4. Discussion 

return to Article Outline

The present study demonstrates a significant difference in the frequency of photophobia in patients with PSP compared to those with CBS. This result suggests that the presence of photophobia may help clinicians to better differentiate between PSP and CBS on a clinical basis, and may be a helpful feature in predicting underlying pathology.

The pathophysiology of photophobia is not entirely understood. Studies have pointed to the trigeminal nerve as one necessary component for photophobia. Rat studies have demonstrated trigeminal connections to the thalamus, superior colliculi, ventral part of the zona concerta, and anterior pretectal nucleus [4]. Other studies have suggested a role of the optic nerve and its connections with the pretectal nuclei. Indeed, it may be an interaction of these two pathways that produce photophobia [4]. The corresponding subcortical location of the trigeminal and optic nerve connections and typical subcortical location of PSP pathology, such as the superior colliculi, may explain the high incidence of photophobia found in our PSP population. The subcortical location of PSP pathology contrasts with the more cortical location of pathology found in CBD and may explain the relatively low frequency of photophobia found in patients with CBS in our study. In fact, both CBS patients with photophobia were two of only three CBS patients with vertical gaze palsy suggesting pathological involvement of brainstem nuclei in these two subjects. A more definitive explanation of the mechanism for why photophobia is more prevalent in PSP compared to CBS will require further research into the exact pathophysiology of photophobia.

Visual hallucinations and RBD were rare occurrences in each population making them unhelpful in clinical differentiation between PSP and CBS. The low occurrence of RBD is not surprising since this clinical phenomenon has been shown to be suggestive of underlying alpha-synuclein pathology, and both PSP and CBD are characterized by the deposition of the microtubule associated protein tau (MAPT) and not alpha-synuclein pathology [5]. One clinicopathologic study investigated the underlying neurodegenerative pathology in clinically or polysomnography confirmed cases of RBD in patients with dementia or parkinsonian symptoms. The pathologic diagnoses in this study of 15 autopsy confirmed cases were Lewy body disease (LBD) in 12 patients and multiple system atrophy (MSA) in 3 patients [5]; both LBD and MSA are characterized by alpha-synuclein pathology.

Litvan et al. showed that the presence of gait abnormality, bilateral bradykinesia, and moderate to severe vertical supranuclear gaze palsy help to distinguish PSP from CBS [6]. Their study was based on pathologically confirmed cases of these two diseases. Since our study is based on clinical and/or pathologic criteria, we cannot conclude that the presence of photophobia will definitely predict pathologic confirmation of PSP. However, 15% of our cases were pathologically confirmed and prior studies have shown that more than 75% of clinically diagnosed PSP patients have PSP pathology [7].

The results of our study suggest that patients suspected to have PSP or CBD should be questioned regarding the presence or absence of photophobia as part of routine questioning. As we continue to recruit more subjects, we expect to have significantly more power, as well as more autopsy confirmation, which is a current limitation, and we will be able to provide sensitivity and specificity statistics. In this study, we demonstrate for the first time that the presence of photophobia may be an additional useful clinical feature to differentiate PSP from CBD.

Conflict of interest 

return to Article Outline

The authors have no conflict of interest.

References 

return to Article Outline

[1]. [1]Litvan I, Bhatia KP, Burn DJ, Goetz CG, Lang AE, McKeith I, et al. Movement disorders society scientific issues committee report: SIC Task Force appraisal of clinical diagnostic criteria for parkinsonian disorders. Mov Disord. 2003;18(5):467–486. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[2]. [2]Boeve BF, Lang AE, Litvan I. Corticobasal degeneration and its relationship to progressive supranuclear palsy and frontotemporal dementia. Ann Neurol. 2003;54(Suppl. 5):S15–S19. CrossRef

[3]. [3]Brusa A, Mancardi GL, Bugiani O. Progressive supranuclear palsy 1979: an overview. Ital J Neurol Sci. 1980;1(4):205–222. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[4]. [4]Amini A, Digre K, Couldwell WT. Photophobia in a blind patient: an alternative visual pathway. J Neurosurg. 2006;105(5):765–768. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[5]. [5]Boeve BF, Silber MH, Parisi JE, Dickson DW, Ferman TJ, Benarroch EE, et al. Synucleinopathy pathology and REM sleep behavior disorder plus dementia or parkinsonism. Neurology. 2003;61(1):40–45.

[6]. [6]Litvan I, Campbell G, Mangone CA, Verny M, McKee A, Chaudhuri KR, et al. Which clinical features differentiate progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele–Richardson–Olszewski syndrome) from related disorders? A clinicopathological study. Brain. 1997;120:65–74. CrossRef

[7]. [7]Josephs KA, Dickson DW. Diagnostic accuracy of progressive supranuclear palsy in the society for progressive supranuclear palsy brain bank. Mov Disord. 2003;18(9):1018–1026. MEDLINE | CrossRef

Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 (507) 538 1038; fax: +1 (507) 538 6012.

PII: S1353-8020(08)00037-0

doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2008.01.011


View previous. 14 of 21 View next.