Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 53-58 (January 2009)


View previous. 13 of 21 View next.

Octarepeat changes of prion protein in Parkinson's disease

Vinchi Wangab1, Tzu-Chao Chuangcd1, Bing-Wen Soongef, Din-E. ShanefCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Ming-Ching KaoghCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 24 January 2008; received in revised form 4 March 2008; accepted 5 March 2008.

Abstract 

Polymorphism in prion protein (PrP) is related to different phenotypes of spongiform encephalopathies and some mental illnesses. The octarepeat region of PrP, encompassing the codon 51 through 91, is related to cellular anti-oxidation function and may play a role in genetic contribution of PrP polymorphism to neurodegeneration, such as Parkinson's disease (PD). We analyzed the genomic patterns of PrP gene from 528 subjects and found a predominance of Met/Met variant at codon 129 of PD subjects without significant difference (97.3%, and 96.5% in controls). But among PD subjects there were one with heterozygosity of silent nucleotide substitution (NS) on octarepeats (R1–2–3g–3–4/R1–2–2–3–4) and three with heterozygosity of single copy deletion (CD) on octarepeats (R1–2–3–4/R1–2–2–3–4). Consistent genomic DNA and cDNA sequences were found in a PD subject without any octarepeat changes and the one with NS, but R1–2–3g–3–4/R1–2–2–3–4 of cDNA pattern occurred in the one with genomic CD. This is the first report of the polymorphic PrP octarepeat change among those with parkinsonism. We proposed a hypothesis about an initial secondary hairpin structure of the template strand followed by the transcript “shift backward” due to the high homology of the sequences between R2 and R3 motifs while synthesizing RNA. This phenomenon may be a key step of neurodegeneration resulting from PrP polymorphism and require further studies.

Article Outline

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Patients

2.2. Genotyping by PCR-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and sequencing

2.3. RNA extraction and reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR)

3. Results

4. Discussion

Acknowledgment

References

Copyright

1. Introduction 

return to Article Outline

Parkinson's disease (PD), with dopaminergic neuron loss in substantia nigra, has been regarded as the second most common neurodegenerative disease probably attributed to both environmental and genetic etiologies. Clinically the symptoms of PD consists of tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity, and postural instability, mostly with asymmetric onset. Some familial PD cases have mutations in α-synuclein, parkin, UCH-L1, LRRK2, or PINK1 genes [1]. Suspicious genes have been evaluated in patients with sporadic PD, for example, the beta-glucocerebrosidase [2]. In addition to the pathological findings of dopaminergic neuronal loss and cytoplasmic Lewy body, there are evidences of microglial activation, oxidative stress and inflammation in the dopaminergic neurons of substantia nigra in PD [3], [4], [5], and protection of midbrain cells by indomethacin and naloxone from the lipopolysaccharide-induced lesion [6].

Inflammatory microglial activation was also seen in another neurodegenerative disease, Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD), which is one of the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE) [7]. Some parkinsonian features in addition to myoclonus and ataxia may occur in CJD. The causative agent has been attributed to prion protein (PrP), an inducible protein [8], which involves diverse cell functions, including neural synaptic transmission, neuroplasticity, signal transduction, cell survival, anti-oxidation and superoxide dismutase activity, and even infectious disease. It contains 253 amino acids, encoded by the PRNP gene on the chromosome 20. Some familial TSE cases are related to mutations of PRNP gene, and polymorphisms of PRNP gene have also been reported to be associated with several human diseases, such as Met129Met with the new variant CJD [9] and early-onset memory disorder [10], 178Asn and 129Val with CJD, 178Asn and 129Met with familial fatal insomnia [11], and Asn171Ser with the surgical outcome of mesial temporal seizure [12]. Another domain of PrP, octarepeat region of PrP through the codon 51–91, abbreviated as R1–R2–R2–R3–R4 on the amino acid sequences, is related to the copper ion binding [13] and the anti-oxidative effect [14]. There were reports about octarepeat insertion associated with one genetic PrP disease [15], but few reports about the disease-associated deletion variants. Conformational change of PrP might be an immediate result from insertion or deletion in PrP, no matter whether gain or loss of function occurred.

On searching the new genetic factors in PD, the objective of the present study is to explore whether PrP polymorphism may play a role in the pathogenesis of PD, with evidences of some clinical features and pathological presence of microglial activation in both of PD and CJD, especially the codon 129 and the octarepeat region. This report not only gives information about the genetic distribution of the codon 129 of PrP among the parkinsonian subjects in Taiwan, but also is the first one about octarepeat changes of PrP among those with PD. A hypothesis about the possibly disorder of RNA synthesis from polymorphic DNA strands is proposed, and may be regarded as one of the pathomechanisms in neurodegeneration, such as in PD.

2. Materials and methods 

return to Article Outline

2.1. Patients 

We recruited the patients with PD and controls into this study after informed consents were obtained. Clinically PD was diagnosed according to the criteria of UK Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank. We recorded the general history including the chronological age, sex, age of onset, family history, the response to levodopa therapy, and excluded those with evidence of secondary parkinsonism caused by other neurological diseases by neuroimage studies or known drugs or toxins. Clinical scoring by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and Hoehn–Yahr staging were obtained in the PD group. We examined 329 PD subjects (142 females and 187 males, with mean age of 72.4years) and 199 controls (84 females and 115 males, with mean age of 71.3years). Healthy subjects and patients with non-PD diseases, such as stroke, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, seizures and spine disorders, were recruited in the control group.

2.2. Genotyping by PCR-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and sequencing 

The sample DNA (20ng) was subjected to PCR with primers (GenBank, accession number AY569456): sense, PRNP-1F: 5′-GAA CCT TGG CTG CTG GAT G-3′; anti-sense, PRNP-1R: 5′-ACA TCT GCT CAA CCA CGC G-3′. The 70μl of PCR mixture included Taq polymerase (1.0unit), primers (10pmol/μl of each primer pairs), dNTPs (200μM each), 10× buffer (7μl) and MgCl2 (3.0mM). By using the thermocycler (GeneAmp PCR system 2400, Perkin-Elmer), the annealing temperatures for PCR were 60°C for 50s during the first five cycles and 54°C for 10s during the following 30 cycles. Nested PCR method was conducted for RFLP analysis of codon 129, via the sense primer 5′-GCA CCC ACA GT-3′ and antisense primer 5′-TCC ATC ATC TTA AC-3′. The resulting fragments, the initial product with 635bp and the nested with 340bp, were then subjected to restriction enzyme digestion with NspI (New England Biolabs) to recognize the amino acid codon 129 of PrP gene. These fragments were visible on the 2% agarose gel after ethidium bromide staining, and analyzed by sequencing via the primer 5′-TCC ATC ATC TTA AC-3′. Octarepeats were evaluated from these sequence data, checking whether the copy variants (NS, e.g. R2a, R2c, R3g) [15] or changes of copy numbers were present. The chi-square analysis was applied to analyzing the polymorphism data.

2.3. RNA extraction and reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) 

The fresh blood samples were drawn from the five subjects in EDTA-containing tubes, diluted with PBS and then addition of 3ml of Ficoll-paque (Sigma). The RNA was extracted by the Super RNApure™ kit (Genesis) according to the manufacture's guide, followed by separation with chloroform and precipitation with isopropanol. The RNA pellets were dissolved in 50μl of diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated water. Reverse transcription was performed with 5μg of RNA samples in the presence of oligo-d(T)15 primer and M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega) at 50°C for 60min. The PCR for cDNA was conducted initially by using the primer pair, 5′-GCA GTC ATT ATG GCG AAC CTT GG-3′ (sense) and 5′-TCC TCA TCC CAC TAT CAG GAA GA-3′ (anti-sense), and then nested for 38 cycles by using PRNP-1F and PRNP-1R primer pair, with annealing temperature of 55°C. Finally, nucleotide sequencing read the octarepeat region of cDNA.

3. Results 

return to Article Outline

The DNA samples from our subjects were subjected to PCR and re-confirmatory sequencing of all the products after restriction digestion, which revealed only one Val/Val homozygote at codon 129 in the control group. Met/Val heterozygotes were found as 9 among PD subjects (2.7%) and 6 among controls (3.0%). The Val-harboring rate was 1.4% among PD subjects and 2.0% in controls. The rest of PD patients and controls were all Met/Met homozygotes at codon 129. This genetic polymorphic distribution of Met and Val allele disclosed no difference between the PD and the control groups (χ2=0.65, df=1, p=0.42).

All the control subjects exhibited the homozygotic R1–2–2–3–4/R1–2–2–3–4 pattern on octarepeat analysis. But four PD subjects had changes in the octarepeat region. Their brief histories were listed in Table 1. Subject 9361 had an unusual initial presentation of orobuccolingual dyskinesia but later developed rigidity and bradykinesia, with clinical diagnosis of PD supported by reduced and asymmetric putaminal uptake on 99mTc-TRODAT-1 SPECT. One patient had the nucleotide substitution (NS) heterozygosity (R1–2–3g–3–4/R1–2–2–3–4, R3g sequence: CCC CAT GGT GGT GGC TGG GGg CAG) in the second R2 copy (Fig. 1A). This silent change encodes proline (CCC or CCT) and glycine (GGG or GGA) on protein synthesis. We also found three heterozygous PD subjects with a R2 repeat deletion (CD pattern) in one allele, resulting in R1–2–3–4/R1–2–2–3–4 pattern (Fig. 1B,C). The same results were obtained repeatedly in triplicate. The shorter and longer bands detected on electrophoresis were further eluted from the agarose gel and the sequential sequencing confirmed the CD phenomenon. All these four patients with octarepeat changes exhibit Met/Met allele at codon 129. No other octarepeat changes occur among our subjects, such as copy insertion, other copy deletion or NS variants (e.g. R2a or R2c).

Table 1.

The brief histories of the PD subjects with octarepeat changes of PrP

Patient
Sex
Age at onset
Onset region
Presenting symptom
Octarepeat genotype
9361M77OrobuccalDyskinesiaR1–2–3–4/R1–2–2–3–4
9805M70Left limbTremorR1–2–3–4/R1–2–2–3–4
9917F50Left limbRigidityR1–2–3–4/R1–2–2–3–4
0051M76Left limbTremorR1–2–3g–3–4/R1–2–2–3–4

View full-size image.

Fig. 1 The octarepeat changes of PrP in the PD subjects. (A) The genomic sequencing of the PD patient with R1,2,2,3,4/R1,2,3g,3,4 heterozygosity. R2 sequence: CCT CAT GGT GGT GGC TGG GGG CAG, and R3g sequence: CCC CAT GGT GGT GGC TGG GGg CAG. (B) The electrophoretic finding of the PCR product of the heterozygote PD subject with octarepeat CD. (C) The sequencing of the shorter gel fragment revealed CD and presented as R1–2–3–4.


To examine the expression of transcripts in those with octarepeat changes, we performed cDNA analysis by recruiting five subjects, two controls and three PD individuals. The individual genomic DNA patterns of the three PD subjects were NS heterozygosity of R1–2–3g–3–4/R1–2–2–3–4, CD heterozygosity of the single R2, and wild-type homozygosity without octarepeat changes. All these three RT-PCR products had single band on electrophoresis. The cDNA of the two controls and the PD subject with wild-type genome were homozygotes of R1–2–2–3–4/R1–2–2–3–4. The cDNA sequencing disclosed consistent R1–2–3g–3–4/R1–2–2–3–4 in the heterozygote with genomic NS but discordant in the one with genomic CD (Fig. 2). The PCR results of the genomic DNA and cDNA were conducted in triplicate and duplicate, respectively. Besides, we also used the FailSafeTM PCR PreMix Selection Kit (Biotechnologies) to amplify this GC-rich region, as the already known fact that GC-rich template may form secondary structure leading to truncated products. The sequences of the products were the same as the prior studies.


View full-size image.

Fig. 2 The PrP cDNA sequence of the PD subject with genomic CD heterozygosity showed the R4–3–3g–2–1 pattern (antisense reading) rather than R4–3–2–2–1.


4. Discussion 

return to Article Outline

Polymorphic distribution of PrP may differ in populations, and the most known polymorphic locus is the codon 129. There was a lower Val-carrying rate in Asian population but, in Europe, the Val/Val allele was found in about 7–9% population and Met/Val allele in 44–50% population [16]. In this study, we found only one Val/Val homozygote who is a control subject. The main population in this study is Met/Met homozygotes in both groups, while the frequency of Met/Val allele is 2.7% in the PD subjects and 3.0% in controls. It presented a result of Met129Val not associated with PD, as the report in the districts outside Asia [17]. The polymorphism at codon 129 of PrP was not regarded as a susceptible locus for Alzheimer's disease [18], but we surveyed the genotypes of codon 129 in our subjects due to the prior report about the association with hypokinetic-rigid parkinsonism [19]. Val allele has been reported to have protective effect from neurodegeneration, e.g., the Val/Val genotypes with less expression of the vCJD [20], the Met/Val heterozygotes with longer survival in sporadic CJD [21] and one Met/Val heterozygote remaining asymptomatic from vCJD 5 years after transfusion of the contaminated blood [22]. From the molecular viewpoint, rapid β-sheet-rich oligomerization of the Met variant of PrP may be an explanation for the increased disease susceptibility in CJD [23]. It has once been proposed that an alternative initiation site of translation at codon 129 in Met variant may be present, which did not get confirmed by the cDNA analysis from our five subjects who all carry Met/Met homozygosity. Although there is no association of codon 129 polymorphism with PD in this study, we did not exclude the possibility that the PrP might contribute to the vulnerability to the diseases with functional element in the promoter [24] or in 3′-untranslated region rather than in the reading frame.

Octarepeat changes in our four PD subjects, one with NS and three with CD, occurred with a prevalence of 1.2%. The NS pattern, R3g, in one of the PD subjects (R1–2–3g–3–4/R1–2–2–3–4) is considered as a degenerated codon with synonymous translation. A son of this patient possesses homozygotic R1–2–2–3–4/R1–2–2–3–4. R3g may be considered as the oligomer hybrid of the R3 (5′-half) and R2 (3′-half), but how R3g develops in evolution and what outcome it goes is still elusive. Two possibilities rise: (1) modification of cytidine methylation in the Watson or Crick strands in R3g as well as the other NS variants (such as R2a or R2c) with the GC-rich content; or (2) the alternative splicing by the “GC-AG” [25] or “AT-AC” classes [26] rather than the canonical “GT-AG” rule after nucleotide substitutions in R2 copies and R3g in R3 copy, resulting in in-frame changes of PrP on translation. However, the RT-PCR results from our PD subject with NS phenomenon of octarepeat of PrP did not show evidence of alternative splicing of PrP.

Another change of octarepeat region in our PD subjects is CD. PrP octarepeats may prevent formation of PrP amyloid fibrils [27] and a possible sacrificial role during oxidative stress [28]. R2 deletion occurred in one subject of the Korean population [29] and among our parkinsonian subjects, but is absent among our controls. The CD phenomenon of PrP octarepeats has been reported in two subjects with the iatrogenic CJD in the past [30] but the relationship between susceptibility of CJD and CD phenomenon is still not known. CD may change the tertiary structure of PrP, resulting in the reduced binding affinity of copper ion, a loss of anti-oxidative function of PrP, different epitope expression of PrP and aberrant cell signaling. But it is difficult to explain the discrepancies of findings of the cDNA (R1–2–3g–3–4/R1–2–2–3–4) and genomic DNA in our PD heterozygote with R2 deletion, R1–2–3–4/R1–2–2–3–4. We propose one hypothesis here (Fig. 3), including the longer DNA strand as the template, hairpin structure in the transcription bubble, and transcript shift to continue the synthesis of this RNA motif. This consequence of RNA synthesis resulted in the R4–3–3g–2–1 (Fig. 2). The shorter coding strand with CD might play a key role while forming the hairpin structure due to unequal length of DNA in the transcription bubble. The R2 fragment just near the R3 might contribute to the RNA synthesis and form the secondary structure. But the “shift-backward” synthesis on the R3 template in this hypothesis may be a speculative phenomenon without evidences in our study. If the hypothesis works, it may explain the generation of the degenerate codons R2a, R2c and R3g based on the presence of CD of one allele, but is still not able to know how CD formed while chromosomal recombination and segregation of mitosis take place. Although absence of the cultures of fibroblasts or lymphocytes from the PD subject with CD to prove this hypothesis, we still considered the changed secondary structure of DNA template strand as a possible mechanism related to PD reported here. Neurodegenerative signal might begin from the RNA level.


View full-size image.

Fig. 3 The hypothesis about the synthesis of the RNA sequence of R1–2–3g–3–4 in the genomic CD heterozygotes. (A) The longer DNA strand (R1–2–2–3–4) acted as the template. Transcription took place from the R4 fragment, followed by the R3, and then the partial R2 (symbolized as r2). (B) The hairpin structure formed by the two tandem R2 repeats was attributed to the unequal length of the DNA strands in the transcription bubble. The structure caused by GGGGG in one R2 motif and CCTC in the other tandem R2 in the transcription bubble rendered the transcript “shifting backward” to R3 motif which has the high homology to R2 sequence. The backward shift was for the purpose to release the hairpin structure, resulting in the tandem partial R3 synthesis (symbolized as r3) and thus the oligomer hybrid of the R3 and R2 formed. (C) Recovery of the secondary structure occurred on synthesizing the fourth copy via the template R2 and the R2–R1 synthesis continued.


In this study, we found no significant polymorphic difference at codon 129 of PrP between PD and control subjects, but a minor group of PD subjects having octarepeat changes. All of the subjects with CD or NS patterns of octarepeat displayed Met/Met homozygosity at codon 129. These changes may be regarded as silent polymorphic variants as the RNA evaluation by RT-PCR. However, it may give hints about octarepeat polymorphism during degeneration of dopaminergic neurons, possibly not only attributed to the protein molecule but to the RNA or other molecules taking part in the neurodegeneration.

Acknowledgement 

return to Article Outline

This work was supported by the grant from the Cardinal Tien Hospital (CTH-92-1-1A01 and CTH-93-1-1A01). The authors also thank Mr. Kung-Chuan Ho and Dr. Tzu-Ching Chang for their technical assistances in the lab.

References 

return to Article Outline

[1]. [1]Hardy J, Cai H, Cookson MR, Gwinn-Hardy K, Singleton A. Genetics of Parkinson's disease and parkinsonism. Ann Neurol. 2006;60:389–398. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[2]. [2]Aharon-Peretz J, Rosenbaum H, Gershoni-Baruch R. Mutations in the glucocerebrosidase gene and Parkinson's disease in Ashkenazi Jews. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1972–1977.

[3]. [3]Le W, Rowe D, Xie W, Ortiz I, He Y, Appel SH. Microglial activation and dopaminergic cell injury: an in vitro model relevant to Parkinson's disease. J Neurosci. 2001;21:8447–8455.

[4]. [4]Yoo MS, Chun HS, Son JJ, DeGiorgio LA, Kim DJ, Peng C, et al. Oxidative stress regulated genes in nigral dopaminergic neuronal cells: correlation with the known pathology in Parkinson's disease. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2003;10:76–84.

[5]. [5]Orr CF, Rowe DB, Mizuno Y, Mori H, Halliday GM. A possible role for humoral immunity in the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease. Brain. 2005;128:2665–2674. CrossRef

[6]. [6]Wang V, Chia LG, Ni DR, Cheng LJ, Ho YP, Cheng FC, et al. Effects of the combined treatment of naloxone and indomethacin on catecholamines and behavior after intranigral lipopolysaccharide injection. Neurochem Res. 2004;29:341–346. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[7]. [7]Baker CA, Manuelidis L. Unique inflammatory RNA profiles of microglia in Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:675–679. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[8]. [8]Wang V, Chuang TC, Hsu YD, Chou WY, Kao MC. Nitric oxide induces prion protein via MEK and p38 MAPK signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;333:95–100. CrossRef

[9]. [9]Will RG, Zeidler M, Stewart GE, Macleod MA, Ironside JW, Cousens SN, et al. Diagnosis of new variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. Ann Neurol. 2000;47:575–582. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[10]. [10]Riemenschneider M, Klopp N, Xiang W, Wagenpfeil S, Vollmert C, Müller U, et al. Prion protein codon 129 polymorphism and risk of Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2004;63:364–366.

[11]. [11]Goldfarb LG, Petersen RB, Tabaton M, Brown P, LeBlanc AC, Montagna P, et al. Fatal familial insomnia and familial Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease: disease phenotype determined by a DNA polymorphism. Science. 1992;258:806–808. MEDLINE

[12]. [12]Walz R, Castro RM, Velasco TR, Alexandre V, Lopes MH, Leite JP, et al. Surgical outcome in mesial temporal sclerosis correlates with prion protein gene variant. Neurology. 2003;61:1204–1210.

[13]. [13]Aronoff-Spencer E, Burns CS, Avdievich NI, Gerfen GJ, Peisach J, Antholine WE, et al. Identification of the Cu2+ binding sites in the N-terminal domain of the prion protein by EPR and CD spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 2000;39:13760–13771.

[14]. [14]Sakudo A, Lee DC, Nishimura T, Li S, Tsuji S, Nakamura T, et al. Octapeptide repeat region and N-terminal half of hydrophobic region of prion protein (PrP) mediate PrP-dependent activation of superoxide dismutase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;326:600–606. CrossRef

[15]. [15]Goldfarb LG, Brown P, McCombie WR, Goldgaber D, Swergold GD, Wills PR, et al. Transmissible familial Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease associated with five, seven, and eight extra octapeptide coding repeats in the PRNP gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:10926–10930. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[16]. [16]Wang KC, Wang V, Sun MC, Chiueh TI, Soong BW, Shan DE. Polymorphism distribution of prion protein codon 117, 129 and 171 in Taiwan. Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22:257–261. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[17]. [17]Scholz SW, Xiromerisiou G, Fung HC, Eerola J, Hellström O, Papadimitriou A, et al. The human prion gene M129V polymorphism is not associated with idiopathic Parkinson's disease in three distinct populations. Neurosci Lett. 2006;395:227–229. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[18]. [18]Del Bo R, Scarlato M, Ghezzi S, Martinelli-Boneschi F, Fenoglio C, Galimberti G, et al. Is M129V of PRNP gene associated with Alzheimer's disease? A case-control study and a meta-analysis. Neurobiol Aging. 2006;27:770;e1–5. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (114 KB)

[19]. [19]Gossrau G, Herting B, Möckel S, Kempe A, Koch R, Reichmann H, et al. Analysis of the polymorphic prion protein gene codon 129 in idiopathic Parkinson's disease. J Neural Transm. 2006;13:331–337.

[20]. [20]Wadsworth JD, Asante EA, Desbruslais M, Linehan JM, Joiner S, Gowland I, et al. Human prion protein with valine 129 prevents expression of variant CJD phenotype. Science. 2004;306:1793–1796. CrossRef

[21]. [21]Pocchiari M, Puopolo M, Croes EA, Budka H, Gelpi E, Collins S, et al. Predictors of survival in sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease and other human transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. Brain. 2004;127:2348–2359. CrossRef

[22]. [22]Peden AH, Head MW, Ritchie DL, Bell JE, Ironside JW. Preclinical vCJD after blood transfusion in a PRNP codon 129 heterozygous patient. Lancet. 2004;364:527–529. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (189 KB) | CrossRef

[23]. [23]Tahiri-Alaoui A, Gill AC, Disterer P, James W. Methionine 129 variant of human prion protein oligomerizes more rapidly than the valine 129 variant: implications for disease susceptibility to Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:31390–31397. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[24]. [24]Kashkevich K, Humeny A, Ziegler U, Groschup MH, Nicken P, Leeb T, et al. Functional relevance of DNA polymorphisms within the promoter region of the prion protein gene and their association to BSE infection. FASEB J. 2007;21:1547–1555. CrossRef

[25]. [25]Thanaraj TA, Clark F. Human GC-AG alternative intron isoforms with weak donor sites show enhanced consensus at acceptor exon positions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:2581–2593. CrossRef

[26]. [26]Wu Q, Krainer AR. U1-mediated exon definition interactions between AT-AC and GT-AG introns. Science. 1996;274:1005–1008. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[27]. [27]Bocharova OV, Breydo L, Salnikov VV, Baskakov IV. Copper(II) inhibits in vitro conversion of prion protein into amyloid fibrils. Biochemistry. 2005;44:6776–6787.

[28]. [28]Nadal RC, Abdelraheim SR, Brazier MW, Rigby SE, Brown DR, Viles JH. Prion protein does not redox-silence Cu2+, but is a sacrificial quencher of hydroxyl radicals. Free Radic Biol Med. 2007;42:79–89. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[29]. [29]Jeong BH, Nam JH, Lee YJ, Lee KH, Jang MK, Carp RI, et al. Polymorphisms of the prion protein gene (PRNP) in a Korean population. J Hum Genet. 2004;49:319–324. MEDLINE

[30]. [30]Brown P, Cervenáková L, Goldfarb LG, McCombie WR, Rubenstein R, Will RG, et al. Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease: an example of the interplay between ancient genes and modern medicine. Neurology. 1994;44:291–293. MEDLINE

a Department of Neurology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

b School of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, Taipei, Taiwan

c Department of Chemistry, Tamkang University, Tamsui, Taipei, Taiwan

d Graduate Institute of Life Sciences, Tamkang University, Tamsui, Taipei, Taiwan

e The Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

f Department of Neurology, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan

g Department of Biological Science and Technology, College of Life Sciences, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

h Department of Biochemistry, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at. Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, 201, Sec. 2, Shih-Pai Road, Taipei 112, Taiwan. Fax: +886 2 2875 7579.

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at. Department of Biological Science and Technology, College of Life Sciences, China Medical University, 91 Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung 40402, Taiwan. Tel./fax: +886 4 2205 3764.

1 Wang V and Chuang TC contributed equally to this work.

PII: S1353-8020(08)00099-0

doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2008.03.003


View previous. 13 of 21 View next.